Enigma at 35,000 Ft-Malaysian Flight 370
NASA photographs taken March 10th 2014 capture the salvage of parts of a Malaysian airliner off the coast of Vietnam:
Images were released to the public by NASA on March 31st of this year. The photographs were taken just two days after the disappearance of Malaysian Flight 370. The passenger plane went missing over the waters between Malaysia and Vietnam shortly after the pilot had said good night to Malaysia’s tower and shortly before entering the airspace of Vietnam. In a normal world, this would have been the first place to conduct a thorough search, but it wasn’t. Instead, the public was treated to a “Where’s Waldo” style search of waters off Thailand and then Australia…apparently while a salvage vessel quietly gathered airliner sections off Vietnam’s southern coast.
Well, well, well…what have we here ? That certainly looks like the paint detail used by Malaysian airlines, doesn’t it? But the evening news hasn’t breathed a word about this, so it can’t be true. Right?
. There was a very early report from a worker on an oil platform in Vietnamese waters stating that he saw an intact plane in flames the night of March 8th. This report was dismissed out of hand when two days later Thailand announced that it had radar evidence that MH370 had made a radical left turn, crossing back over Penang, heading north over Thai waters. Then satellite company Inmarsat chimed in with a report that the airplane’s Boeing engines had continued to check in for seven hours after it went missing. That pretty well quashed the oil rig worker’s report .
All eyes shifted to waters off Australia’s western coast…some of the deepest waters in the world. They heard Waldo faintly pinging there, so they said. For more NASA photos of the sneaky salvage as well as the platform worker’s report, go here:
And here is a fascinating critique of Inmarsat’s Boeing engine ping data and their conclusions:
So, it looks for all the world that we have found Waldo….
Or have we? Might we instead have found the Israeli sister ship? To accept that this is MH370 being quietly plucked from Vietnamese waters means that we must discard reports from Maldives that a passenger jet with Malaysian air markings passed so low overhead that people rushed out of their homes to see what was causing a loud roar at 6:15 am the day of the disappearance . This is firm. Whatever theory one comes up with, this must be included in some way that makes sense.
And why would Ft. Lauderdale based GA Telesis feel compelled to plant a back dated press release about the sister plane? They seemed to retroactively feel the need to establish that the sister plane was in Tel Aviv for the purpose of dismantling it.
We must also not disregard reports from relatives that loved one’s cell phones continued to ring hours after the missed landing time in Beijing. The problem here is that we can not dismiss factual information, just as we must not dismiss what we see in those NASA photos. We do see the distinctive Malaysian Air design. But here is what we don’t see…bodies… seats, flotation cushions …luggage. The photos were taken only a day or so after the disappearance of the plane. Would the waters be so devoid of flotsam if this were the crash site of a flight loaded with cargo and 239 luggage bearing occupants? This looks to be some sheepishly quiet gathering of the embarrassing fragments of a failed plan. I think the artificiality of the event is revealed this way. NASA photos show a fragmented plane being salvaged near Vietnam, near where MH370 went off radar.
Unfortunately, Thailand shows it cutting a sharp left heading west, and then cutting north. At least nine eyewitnesses saw or heard a plane flying very low along the coast of northern Malaysia at 2:15 am. These eyewitness reports would support the Thai radar to a degree.
There is zero evidence supporting the plane crossing back yet again and crashing in the waters where it first went missing and was subsequently photographed by NASA. . Inmarsat, owned by Harbinger Capital )formerly known as Zapata Oil, A George Bush Sr company) says MH 370’s engines pinged for at least six hours. and submitted a diagram that sent everybody looking in all the wrong places. As noted in other articles on this site, there always seems to be a Bush thumb in every poison pie.
So, what have we got here, exactly?
A plane was observed flying at low altitude over two locations-Penang, Malaysia and at the south most island of Maldives. Maldives had no fewer than twenty witnesses pegging the sighting at 6:15 am. The plane was said to have come from the north, heading south east. Pilbara, Australia is south east of that location. Pilbara does have an airport and is in a very remote and sparsely populated region of Australia. The airport is there to transport workers to the iron mines in the area. The previous article. “Devil in the Details”, describes a comment found on a blog stating that a man’s friend reported the sighting of a Malaysian airplane at that airport. Not long after, the friend who witnessed the landing died, as did several other airport workers. according to the comment. We have no way of verifying this report, but given the role that Australia has played in the fruitless plumbing of the depths of the Indian Ocean, one is inclined to wonder.
What we have here is conflicting data combined with a very explosive series of NASA photos that place the plane pretty much everywhere other than the one place it was supposed to go-Beijing. We have it on Thai radar heading north over Thai waters, we have witnesses in north Indonesia that support the Thai radar, we have it flying low over Maldives, we may even have it in Pilbara, Australia. We have Harbinger-owned Inmarsat (formerly” Zapata”-a George Bush Sr company) registering engine pings for six to seven hours, and an exhaustive, though fruitless, search off the western coast of Australia. We have an identical sister plane sitting in a hangar in Israel and a messy U.S. “anti terror” drone attack in Yemen with at least 55 unidentified victims that smells more like an intelligence “wet op” than an anti terror strike.
We know that there is an airport in Al Bayda, Yemen. Coincidentally, the drone attack took place in that very same region. Were there some witnesses in Al Bayda that needed to be expunged? Was MH370 flown to Yemen from Kuala Lampur? Or was the sister plane moved from Israel to Yemen and then flown from Yemen to Australia and then crashed into the waters off the coast of Vietnam?? That particular airplane has plenty of range. It can easily handle the distance between Yemen and Australia.
Blue dotted line=MH 370 conforming to transponder information as well as Thai radar and presuming a Diego Garcia landing
Red dotted line=sister plane stored in Tel Aviv to Pilbara and then ditched near Vietnam
Red solid line-MH 370’s intended destination (but not the actual flight plan)
This may have been a plot to create a major international incident between Iran and Israel, one intended to ensnare China to support Iran. Originally, the finger seemed to point to two young Iranian males with stolen passports. Remember the ridiculous photograph of the two suspects at the airport. The same legs were used for both and the photo shopping was comically amateur. The move by GA Telesis may have been an attempt to walk it back just as much as it may have been an attempt to account for the sister plane.
There is only one thing for certain here….whatever was supposed to happen did not. Something went very, very wrong for the perpetrators and they are no doubt still scrambling for options for their grand finale. The families will not stop seeking answers, nor should they. Only the psychopaths who planned this debacle know for certain where the innocent people on board ended up.