Tag Archive: Gene Rosen


Sandy Hook Fraud- Certainty Principle

– How we can be certain, at long last, that we have been played for fools –

Nearly three years later, the great debate still rages.  In the comment section below nearly any blog article or You Tube video regarding any of the many flaws in the Sandy Hook narrative, we find people who attest to being “the friend of an aunt of a man who lives next door to a Sandy Hook  family that lost a child…. and how dare all of you say these shameful, hurtful things!”

The comment usually ends with something like “you f_ing idiots!”  For good measure, they like to point out that “all these stupid points have been debunked”.  Indeed, all of the stupid points have been debunked, and rightly so. There were many, many “straw dog” arguments  planted along the way and many YouTubers and bloggers fell for them, which is why we find ourselves three years later not quite convinced either way. Everybody knows that there is something very, very wrong with Sandy Hook.

Here are two important definitions from the Urban Dictionary website:

straw dog

“In business, something (an idea, or plan, usually) set up to be knocked down. It’s the dangerous philosophy of presenting one mediocre idea, so that the listener will make the choice of the better idea which follows.

The purpose of a straw dog.is to create cognitive dissonance.  The purpose in creating cognitive dissonance is to ensure that no meaningful action takes place.

cognitive dissonance
A condition of conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between one’s beliefs and one’s actions

Therefore, straw dog  is quite a beautiful and effective psychological tool for blunting effective opposition and redirects human energies to swirl like some turd floating aimlessly in a low flush toilet.

Here are some personal Sandy Hook straw dog favorites:

”  and we brought dad’s baseball cap to Grace “

 

The laughing parents– yes, Robbie Parker (Emilie Parker’s father) and mom and pop McDonnell (parents of Grace McDonnell), confounded and disgusted us all with their ear to ear grins.

The narrative of scribbling on the small, white, occupied casket with Sharpies. of various colors was particularly unsettling.  In this photo, the mother has just told CNN’s Anderson Copper that they brought Grace many things on the day of her funeral, even dad’s baseball cap (Grace loved baseball).  What tremendous composure.  (But start to see it for what it is. It’s a straw dog).

 

Grieving Sandy Hook Father

Grieving Father, Rob Parker

 

And who can forget the devastated Rob Parker as he approached the microphone the very evening of the massacre? (It was his second appearance of the evening, having already spoken at his church.)  He graciously informed the viewing public that a friend had set up a Facebook page in Emilie’s honor so that we could donate to little Emilie.

This guy is just another straw dog.

 

 

Unfortunately, there is no pot at the end of the rainbow in this laughing parent issue  All that a debunker need point out is that people on anti-depressants can often display wholly inappropriate emotional response (which is why many people stop taking them). Since medical records, including prescriptions, are guarded by strict and heavily consequential HIPPA laws, you will never know if there were anti depressants lurking behind this bizarre behavior.  This issue does not and can not ever prove anything with it.

 

Everybody Must Check In

Everybody Must Check In

The electronic sign-Sandy Hook was just a drill as evidenced by the Gene Rosen photograph showing him standing in front of a sign at the Firehouse. The sign said “everyone must check in”.  Truthers crowed that this was proof of a drill, neglecting to check as to when the photo was taken.  As it turned out, the photograph was not taken on December 14th, 2012 and is, instead, evidence of an expected measure taken to protect a crime scene which had yet to be fully investigated and photographed.  No gold here.

 

 

However, there are many far more solid issues yet remaining, issues about which our truth seekers remain curiously silent. Let’s call these points the “undebunkables”.  Since I have now created a new word, albeit it an awkward one, kindly allow me the liberty to create the definition as well…“that which can not be debunked, that which can withstand all efforts to debunk; syn. gotcha

 

Back dated fundraising and tribute pages

  • Joseph Ametrano had posted a video titled:  “Sandy Hook Elementary Tribute” on a VIMEO account weeks ahead of the alleged massacre. Ametrano’s video was captured and re-mixed by Dutchsince to expose the Sandy Hook foreknowledge. It really needs to be noted here that Ametrano posts his musical videos under his company’s name. Bacmaster.  The earliest date found for the posting of the SH tribute was in August of 2012, four months before Sandy Hook happened.  Bacmaster, indeed.
  • United Way’s “Our hearts are with Sandy Hook” fundraising page was crawled and added to the Google search engine on December 11, 2012, three days before Sandy Hook happened.
  • Victoria Soto’s Facebook tribute page was also created on December 11, 2012, three days before Sandy Hook happened.
  • The Sandy Hook Elementary victims fund page was created on December 13, 2012, the day before Sandy Hook happened.
  • Youcaring.com set up their Sandy Hook fund raising page on December 10th, four days before Sandy Hook happened.
SH-AP-foreknowledge-Timothy-Hunter

                                            AP-“Advanced Precognitive” news

And last, but not least, the trusted MSM news source, AP, posted an article about the Sandy Hook tragedy on November 18, 2012, one month before Sandy Hook happened.

Timothy Hunter had made this particular find but his YouTube was taken down for copyright infringement.  Luckily, a blogger, dcclothesline,  took a screen capture  of a telling slide from the video

Note that AP scooped all of the big three;  Sandy Hook, the Aurora Batman shooting and the Boston Bombing.  They must have one hell of a psychic working over there.

To quote dcclothesline, “Lest you think the Nov. 18, 2012 Google time stamp for the “Always smiling: Portraits of Conn. victims” AP story was a mere computer glitch, that AP story was reposted by Suntimes.com, with a publication date of Nov. 20, 2012 — 24 days before the actual Sandy Hook massacre:”

The time stamp issue has withstood the test of time, not to mention countless troll attacks.  Google must have been having fits behind the scenes as people took the position of “Google glitch” to explain the very off time stamps applied to these critical pages.  And if it were only Google, that explanation might suffice, but it was Vimeo and Facebook as well.  This is not a straw dog, this is gold.

Still not convinced? Let’s return to dcclothesline.com for the “rest of the story”:

“Hunter had uploaded his video onto YouTube more than a year an 2 months ago on Jan. 5, 2013. He says that since his discovery, as well as a post on this same AP deception on the blog InsaneMedia, the AP changed the dates and deleted content of the incriminating photos.

More troubling still, Insane Media is no longer accessible even via Google Cache. If you click the preceding “Google Cache” link for Insane Media’s AP photos post, you’ll get this message:

NOTICE: This domain name expired on 3/5/2014 and is pending renewal or deletion.

For the links to all the posts FOTM has done on Sandy Hook, go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page.

A big h/t to Dean Garrison of The D.C. Clothesline.

~Eowyn

Dr. Eowyn is the Editor of Fellowship of the Minds.”

This comment was left at the end of the article :

“All this elucidates is a complete ignorance on how those “timestamps” are created.

Weak… so very fucking weak.”

Mr. Hunter, the man who had produced the YouTube video regarding these glaring time stamp issues,  replied:

I contest that. I am not “ignorant” of how the timestamps are made – in fact I spent a lot of time studying various timestamps from many sources, as well as creating my own to see how you can manipulate them. There are two dates attached to each photo in the AP database – a “creation date” and an “upload date.” The most logical conclusion about the creation date is that it is the date the photo was taken. This is made very clear in the first pictures from the database shown in the video. It is readily apparent if you browse through the AP database yourself.

If I’m misunderstanding these timestamps, then PLEASE explain to me why both Lily Guabert’s photo, as well as Allison Wyatt’s, contained a creation date of 6/15. If you can’t answer that, you’ve got nothing. You see, Lily Gaubert was not even a victim. She was a random woman’s daughter whose picture just happened to be listed as victim Allison Wyatt for days after the hoax occurred.

So you’re left with these options – was Allison Wyatt’s photo taken on the exact same date as her fake replacements – Gaubert? That is very farfetched to believe, especially considering the Hockley photos contain the same date. Since it would be ludicrous to believe that all of these children (one not being a victim) would have had all of their photos taken on the same day, the only option left to believe is that they were uploaded or edited on the same date.

You can understand this better if you watch the video here,http://hunternewsandmedia.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/1-reason-sandy-hook-was-a-hoax/
It is only five minutes, and should help you comprehend if you’re not going to allow your cognitive dissonance to force you to immediately assume we are “hateful” or “weak” as you put it.

This is an educational site, and you are mistaken.

Timothy Hunter’s video is no longer available on YouTube, nor is the website “Insanemedia”.

source:  http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/03/10/sandy-hook-deception-associated-press-stories-photos-predate-massacre/

 

Lily Gaubert

 

"Madeleine Hsu"

Madeleine Hsu”

Lily Gaubery

                    Lily Gaubert

"Allison Wyatt"

      “Allison Wyatt”

 

Many are familiar with this very interesting chapter in the seemingly limitless litany of Sandy Hook anomalies.  In brief, Lily’s mother was shocked to see that a photograph of her daughter was being circulated by MSM, identifying her as Sandy Hook victim, Allison Wyatt.

After Mrs. Gaubert posted a public plea for help, the photo was removed by MSM and replaced with the photo to Lily’s right

It remains unclear as to whether or not Mrs. Gaubert realized that her daughter’s picture was being identified as Madeleine Hsu as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Sandy Hook Math

Sandy Hook Math-All the Numbers

Life of Pi

sandy hook achool

Sandy Hook Elementary

There is something very wrong with the entire story.  This blog has many articles dealing with the primary inconsistencies still remaining in this case.  See the blog menu to the right. When you are done with this article you will find plenty to keep your brain busy.

I have done my best to keep up with the various other blogs and videos calling attention to various discrepancies in the case but no one seems to be focusing on what I consider to be one of the key problems with Sandy Hook (and there are so many)…the number of child victims and where they were located when found. The official narrative echoed in all main stream media and virtually all MSM based blogs tell us the same story; that all but one of Lauren Rousseau’s class perished, that Soto had managed to hide seven of her students in a closet (later found safe and sound) and that she had bravely confronted the shooter telling him that her class was in the auditorium.  We were also told that some of Soto’s children tried to run and were shot dead along with Soto.   It makes no sense but for the sake of this discussion, let’s play along like good little boys and girls  and see where it takes us.

Picture this: Here comes Adam Rambo, boy vegetarian, toting weapons and ammunition that weighs more than he does.  First, he blasts through reinforced glass and wiggles himself and all his gear through the hole he made.  The principal and psychologist are gunned down in the lobby and a third woman, the lead teacher, Natalie Hammond, is wounded but survives.

I’d like to pause here for a moment.  If you are the head of a school and you have been trained on how to execute a school lock down, do you rush toward the thunder of gunshots or do you lock the entry door to your main office, jump on the P.A. and order an immediate lock down while ordering  your secretary to call the police?  Perhaps they were responding  to a noise other than gunfire?  I would surmise that they heard glass breaking but for the fact that the glass was likely well reinforced to be at least bullet resistant, if not bullet proof.

Returning to the official narrative, Natalie Hammond, lead teacher, had followed the principal and psychologist as they departed from the conference room where they had been conferring with a parent.  Having mowed down the principal and psychologist, Rambo mysteriously allowed Natalie Hammond to crawl away, wounded as she was in the leg, hand and foot, bleeding profusely no doubt, and leaving a blood trail… no doubt. Hammond managed to hide behind a door.  The principal’s secretary also hid behind a door.  The nurse, Sarah (Sally) Cox took cover under her computer desk.   The shooter walked into her office.   Instead of following Ms. Hammond’s blood trail and finishing her off, he continued along  to the nurse’s office.

According to Ms. Cox, he was twenty feet away.   She saw him from the knees down and only for a few seconds through a hole cut for computer wiring. Inexplicably, the shooter turned and walked out of the principal’s annex.  We are told he then turned left and headed down the kindergarten corridor. He proceeds to walk past Ms. Roig’s kindergarten class in room one, even though she is busy jamming everybody into a tiny bathroom, making plenty of noise in the process…the screeching of chairs, the pattering of children’s feet across the floor, the sound of a bookcase being pulled across the bathroom door.  Rambo even bypasses Ms. Soto’s class in classroom two.

Rousseau's Class

Lauren Rouesseau’s Class

He went straight to Ms. Rousseau’s group in room number three.  We are told that her room wasn’t locked.  Being a substitute, we were told, she was not given a key. According to official reports circulated by the media, they were all huddled in a far corner of the room.  Police  found one child there barely alive, but the child died at the hospital.  One other child survived by playing dead and she was covered in her classmates’ blood.  In this room, we are told that 14 of 15 children died along with Rousseau and her teaching assistant.

Soto’s room was next.  He doubled back.  He could have continued down the hall or crossed the hall, but he doubled back.  We were never told if Soto’s room was locked.  Assuming  that it was, entry would had to have taken place with great force.  Yet there was no report of her door being breached.  If the lock was fired on, there would be a great deal of damage to it.  Any group of first responders would have stopped there first, one would think, seeing the damage.

The two boys, Aidan Licata and Bryce Maksel, who were in the group that escaped simply stated that when the shooter came into the room they immediately ran. Neither boy said that the shooter blasted the lock first.  So, Soto’s room must have been unlocked …or the shooter had a key.

Staying with official versions, officers discovered seven children alive and well locked in a closet in Ms. Soto’s room.  They have said that the information about Ms Soto telling the shooter that her children were in the auditorium came from these survivors.  In addition, we are told, several of her students made an attempt to flee, but were killed in the act by the shooter.

Here is another spot to hit the pause button.  If Soto had hidden all of her class, then why did some run?  Wouldn’t they have remained where the were?  It seems she had managed to hide only seven.  And if the remaining children were out in plain sight, what good does it do to tell a shooter that the children were somewhere else?  It’s nonsense, but it keeps getting repeated by MSM as if it were gospel.  It reminds me of that “Let’s roll” meme born out of the Flight 93 myth spun from 911.  Had the entire class been hidden, none would have run.  If the shooter entered her room while she was in the act of hiding them, it would do no good to say that they were in the auditorium.  There is no way to salvage this account.  It is, at least in part, an invention.

Moving on to the math, having been told that Rousseau lost fourteen of her fifteen students, and that twenty died in total, six students had to have died in Soto’s room.  Six dead plus seven in a closet equals thirteen. Additionally, a number of children  ran from Soto’s room.  Thankfully, they escaped uninjured.  From official reports, we can not be absolutely certain how many there were, but we do know for certain that there were no fewer than four because the police scanner audio includes an officer reporting in that he is transporting four children over to the fire house.  No fewer than four, and according to Bryce Maksel’s mother, actually a total of five .  So, now we have to add those four to the thirteen which equals seventeen. And if we accept the eyewitness account of six year old Bryce Maksel who told his parents that there were four children with him, this would equal eighteen children. The problem with either account is that Ms Soto had only fifteen (or possibly sixteen) students.  She did not have eighteen.

A friend of Soto’s had written a tribute to Soto: “I talked to Vicki Tuesday and she told me that she loved her 16 angels and never wanted to let them go. Today when the shooting started Vicki hid her kids in closets and when the gunman came into her room she told them the class was in gym. She was then murdered. Not one of her students were harmed. Words can not express how heartbreaking and tragic this. I will miss you dearly.”   Here is where this account can be found:

http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/nation/article/Teacher-died-fighting-for-her-students-4121117.php

You will notice that the “friend” says that Vicki “had hidden all of her students and that not one was harmed”.   We know that “not one was harmed” is not true.  We also know that if some children were not locked in a closet and able to run, then there was no point in telling the shooter that they were somewhere else, so can we rely on this “friend’s” account of sixteen students?  I think not.  The class photo shows fifteen students. Until and unless we can obtain an authentic roster of her class, the only evidence is the photo.  I know that children sometimes miss picture day, but for now, I want to stick with what we can see.  There are few enough facts as it is.

Soto Class 2012

Victoria Soto’s Class

The class photo shows fifteen students.  If we accept the official story, we total too many students between the two classes.  Fourteen dead in Rousseau’s room plus one Rousseau survivor plus seven in Soto’s closet plus six that died with Soto plus five that ran equals…thirty three.  We need to total thirty, thirty one max. This is where Mrs. Maksel’s testimony comes in to help us.  She went to the fire house to wait for her son Bryce to be brought there from the police station.  He and his companions had been picked up by the sister of CT State House Rep John Frey.

Sandy Hook Survivor

Survivor Bryce Maksel

Mrs. Maksel told us two important things; when she arrived at the fire house, there were only five students there from Ms. Soto’s class and that there were five other students total that escaped the room, including her son Bryce.  That’s ten survivors, but one girl survived from Rousseau’s room and that equals eleven. And eleven is one too many. The five children already at the fire station could have only come from the group that had been locked in a closet.  We are left to wonder why all reports said there were seven alive in the closet.  Seven students in the closet throws off even the “official” story that we just analyzed.  To sum up the official story;

A)  Total students: 30

Total deceased: 20

Survivors should be 10 

OR

B) Total students:31

Total deceased: 20

Survivors should be 11

Official survivor count:

  •  1 girl who played dead from Rousseau’s class
  • 7 children in a locked closet in Soto’s room
  • 6 children who ran (per Gene Rosen) from Soto’s class

Survivors:  14  (We can only have 10 or 11 survivors, not 14)

More likely survivor count:

  •  1 girl who played dead from Rousseau’s class
  • 5 children in a locked closet in Soto’s room
  • 5 children who ran (per Mrs Maksel) from Soto’s class

Survivors:  11

In the midst of all this dizzying math, we are forced to consider an entirely  different reality.  Before we go any further, why don’t we carefully examine the two class photos?  Count the total number of children who are not identified, either by name or inset thumbnail photo.  Those would be the survivors and there are twelve.  We were told that fourteen died from Rousseau’s class, but we count thirteen.

Thirteen deceased from Rousseau’s class plus five deceased from Soto’s class yields a very interesting tally, as we will see in a minute.   The total is eighteen.  Remember that…eighteen.

Let us go back in time to the very first reports of Sandy Hook.  The initial reports said that eighteen students died.  In listening to the polices scanner,  we hear an officer reporting in at 10:31am that “one of the places is in the kitchen– teacher and eighteen kids there”.  He made this report twice and used the word “victims“.  There can be no mistake about this.  The officer is not referring to classrooms.  He clearly says “kitchen“.  The kitchen must be near or connected to the cafeteria where we were told that twenty five children were rehearsing.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/12/16/Chilling-Gruesome-Timeline-Emerges-Of-Sandy-Hook-Massacre

So then, suppose we do the math from here instead of the two classrooms.  We will assume that Ms Rousseau’s class and most of Ms Soto’s class were rehearsing for their grade level contribution to planned holiday performances.  They were both first grade.   We will also assume that five, not seven, of Ms Soto’s students remained in the classroom, and subsequently hidden in a closet, probably by her teaching assistant who most likely did not have her own key and like Rousseau, could not lock the door.

Five alive in Soto’s closet plus twenty five rehearsing equal thirty.  Here is the first time that we find a balanced equation with evidence to match (the two class photos).  If we go back to the official story, we have to assume 31 children total in order for the math to work.  But the children were not found in the classrooms, they were found in a closet in the kitchen.  The evidence for this is straight from the police scanner.

One child, Rousseau’s, survived by playing dead. She was covered with classmates blood. She would have been in some tight area with other students for that to happen, so we will assume that there were actually nineteen students in the kitchen closet before the police opened the door.  If six were able to run (Gene Rosen’s story), then we have another balanced equation (19+6=25) and we could be sure that police/media reports of twenty child deaths was a lie.  We could also be certain that police/media accounts of the carnage taking place in the classrooms was also a lie.  According to the police scanner, the classroom scenario is a lie.

More likely survivor count:

  •  1 girl who played dead from Rousseau’s class
  • 5 children in a locked closet in Soto’s room
  • 5 children who ran (per Mrs Maksel) from Soto’s class

Nineteen  in the kitchen closet (18 victims+1 survivor) plus five survivors from Soto’s closet plus five that escaped equals twenty nine.   Getting closer, but no cigar…one short.  Or is it?

If we think back once again to early reports, the most poignant detail that we were given was that there were fourteen backpacks still hanging in Ms. Rousseau’s classroom…fourteen.  But Rousseau had fifteen students.  One of her students most likely missed class that fateful day.  We need to add that child to the survivor count:

Most likely survivor count:

  •  1 girl who played dead from Rousseau’s class
  • 1 child who missed school that day from Rousseau’s class
  • 5 children in a locked closet in Soto’s room
  • 5 children who ran (per Mrs Maksel) from Soto’s class

Survivors:  12

We now have twelve survivors and twelve matches the total number of children in the two class photos who are not labeled (and are, therefore, the survivors).  Eighteen deceased plus twelve who survived equals 30, and this total also matches the photographic evidence of thirty students total.

Now, at last, we have an alignment between the math, the statements on the police scanner and the photographs.  But we also have a much, much bigger problem.  We were told that twenty children died.  We were given twenty names and twenty photographs and twenty funerals.  Were two children murdered somewhere else and then slipped back into the autopsy pool in the middle of the night?  Or are two of the children still alive?

To be continued

 

Sandy Hook Under a Microscope

The media, which got almost nothing right in the first four to six hours of its reporting on the Sandy Hook massacre, has yet  more corruption of fact to answer to in its reporting of Sandy Hook.  According to the recording of the police scanner, the car reported to the public as belonging to Nancy Lanza actually is registered to Christopher Rodia.   You can hear the plate number being called in by an officer early in the recording and he is told that the owner is Rodia.  Before an hour had passed, police knew that the black Honda did not belong  to Nancy Lanza yet told the public that it did.

Police spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance is quoted on January 3rd as saying that he has “never heard of  Rodia”.  He then added “the car confiscated at the scene, the black Honda with that license plate, belongs to a relative of Lanza’s and not to Rodia”.  (Well, LT Vance, of you believe that the vehicle belongs to a Lanza relative, why did you ever say that it belonged to Nancy?)

Lt J Paul Vance

Police Spokesman Vance

According to Greenwich CT Police Capt Mark Kordick, the confusion comes from two different locations roughly 35 miles apart in Connecticut.  The question regarding the plate number of  872YEO comes from Newtown, but the answer, “Christopher Rodia, operator” comes from Greenwich in response to Rodia being checked out up there for parking in a fire zone.  Capt Kordick is positive about this.  His full response will be posted soon.

Now, here is what Rodia has to say, as quoted in the 1/3/13 CTPost,com article:

” ‘That was such a heinous crime, I don’t want to be connected to it in any way,’ Rodia said.  He says he was miles away in Greenwich, getting a warning for illegally parking in a fire zone. ‘I was with my niece driving my mother’s sage green Nissan,’ the 43-year-old Norwalk resident said.”

Notice that Rodia never says that the black Honda is not registered to him, only that he wasn’t in Newtown that day.  And notice that he points out that he was driving his mother’s car, and furthermore, he received a police warning  (air tight alibi that  a) he wasn’t there and b) he wasn’t driving the Honda), but does absolutely nothing to address the ownership of the vehicle.  This is the vehicle where a long gun was removed from the trunk by police investigating Sandy Hook.  Remember that?  This Honda is a prime piece of evidence.  Either it points to Lanza or it points away from him.  Lt. Vance said that Rodia is not the owner, but Rodia did not back that up.  Why didn’t he just say “I don’t own any Honda”?  Instead, it’s “I wasn’t there”.

Rodia denial full story here-Connecticut Post Jan 3, 2013: http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Police-No-Newtown-conspiracy-4162391.php#ixzz2HHJbnCO4

Photo of Christopher Rodia

Christopher Rodia

All very disturbing , but it gets worse.

The police scanner recording begins at 9:35am.  Dispatch reports a caller at Sandy Hook Elementary hearing shots fired.  Within minutes, an officer is on the scene reporting the sighting of broken glass.  (Therefore, by 9:40am, police knew that the shooter was not “buzzed in”)   This is soon followed by a report of bodies and a request for ambulances.   At approximately 10:28am, an officer reports that there are “victims in a closet in the kitchen“.  At 10:31:13, he repeats “teacher and eighteen kids in the kitchen.

Now wait a minute.  According to media reports, the shooter killed the principal and the psychologist in the hall near the main entrance, turned left and proceeded down the hall which housed the kindergarten and first grade classrooms.

The teacher in classroom number one, Ms. Roig  was on the news stating that she was perplexed as to why her room was passed by.  The shooter ignored her room entirely.  She is the teacher who had herded her group into an adjoining bathroom and slid a bookcase in front of the bathroom door.

Sandy Hook Kaitlin Roig

Teacher Kaitlin Roig

She presumed that the shooter thought her room vacant and continued down the hall.  He apparently also walked past Victoria Soto’s room in order to access substitute teacher Lauren Rousseau’s class where, we were told, he murdered her, all fourteen of her students and  special  needs teacher Rachel DaVino.  Then he doubled back and killed Victoria Soto and a portion of her class.  Media reported that police found seven of her students still alive in a closet.  This would mean that six of her pupils died with her since there were twenty child victims in all and fourteen had perished with Ms. Rousseau.

Soto Class 2012

Victoria Soto’s Class

If you look at a school diagram, you realize that the entry hall, principal’s office and Roig’s classroom are all within a few steps of one another.  Even with stopping to kill the principal and the psychologist,  the shooter could have been at Roig’s door within a minute or two.  Would this be enough time for her to herd her entire class into a small bathroom and move a bookcase?  Wouldn’t the shooter have heard the commotion of all the sliding chairs, the pattering of scurrying feet, the screech of a bookcase being dragged?  Could Roig have accomplished all of this in roughly two minutes?

Or did the shooter take a different course?  Did the shooter actually turn to his right to enter the cafeteria?  There were twenty five students in there rehearsing for a school play in the cafeteria at that time.  Where else in this relatively small school could we expect to find a kitchen?  Go here to explore the school interior for yourself:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/fullpage/newtown-ct-shooting-timeline-sandy-hook-elementary-school-18014080

Let’s try to take our analysis a little further.  There were twenty five children rehearsing in the cafeteria.  Eighteen child victims and a teacher were located in a closet in the kitchen.  An onsite police officer said so.  It’s on the scanner at 10:28am and repeated at 10:31am.  This means that some of the children in rehearsal survived…escaped…seven children to be precise.

Aidan Licata

Aidan Licata is an amazing six year old and according to his parents one of Victoria Soto’s pupils at Sandy Hook.  Aidan Licata is a hero.  According to his mother, the second that the shooter entered the room, Aidan grabbed as many of his friends as he could in a few split seconds and ran for his life out of the school.  He stopped to hold the door for one little girl who was the last of his group to exit with him.

Connecticut State Representative John Frey who has nieces and a nephew at Sandy Hook had tweeted:

“Rep. John Frey @johnfrey
Sister, driving to Sandy Hook, came upon some 1st graders running from school. She took them to Police Dept. Kids were shaken. Heartbreaking”

Most likely, this was Aidan and his friends.  State Rep. Frey’s sister likely intercepted Aidan and his classmates.  Can we corroborate that?

According to Aidan’s mother,  he and his friends had been taken to the police station and the police brought them over to the fire station where they were reunited with their parents.  During an interview, Aidan’s dad said “we’re — we’re finding out more and more, every day, but he basically, the children witnessed the shooter, coming into the room and shoot his teacher and continue firing, the children acted on instinct and what they were taught, which was to run. They just ran up to the main road, 100 yards away. My son and several of the other students were extremely brave in what they did and, acted with the courage that I don’t know if I have. And, again, they just ran and were fortunate enough to meet a woman who was — is another hero in the …”

So, here is confirmation that Aidan and his classmates were rescued by a woman, most likely Frey’s sister, so then…

Where does Gene Rosen fit in?

According to Newtown resident, Gene Rosen who was interviewed by many in the “professional” media including CNN, FOX News, the AP and Nancy Grace, he was going out for breakfast when he spotted six kids sitting at the end of his driveway.

If the surviving kids were transported by Frey’s sister straight to the police, then they couldn’t have been sitting on Rosen’s driveway.  And if they weren’t sitting on Rosen’s driveway, then how did he know there were six?  But far more damning,  if they weren’t there to tell him anything, how is he able to name Miss Soto as the teacher?

Here is one of Rosen’s many interviews:

The Girl Who Played Dead

There was one additional survivor, a 6 year old girl, who “played dead” and emerged from the school covered with her classmates blood.  Had the police been there before she emerged from the carnage, the body count in the kitchen closet would have been nineteen.

Assuming  Aidan saved five plus himself , plus eighteen dead in the kitchen closet, plus one girl who played dead, we have 6+18+1=25, the number stated to have been in the cafeteria rehearsing.  But did you notice?  Although this aligns more perfectly with the actual information on the scanner, and supports my cafeteria theory, there are still two children missing.

Was Victoria Soto slated to die that day?  A R.I.P. Facebook page was made for her on 12/10.  Rosen knew her name before the media announced it and said that the kids told him…but the kids weren’t there.  Poor Victoria had to have been in the “script”, in the plan, from the get go.  Her death was in progress well before she died.  Why?

To get filled in on other details, go here:

https://adriaen22.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/sandy-hook-wtf/

Stay tuned…we still have two missing children…

%d bloggers like this: